On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:27:51 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

>
>      Yes, let's see how it goes for this one. I think it should be ok, and 
>I've put the 20/20/20 idea on hold too, but, if I see silly scoring like 
>1/1/1, it might be resurrected again, or the perpetrator gets banned. I 
>personally don't want to ban anyone - that just isn't me, but it would be 
>nice to have some honesty. Sure, if an image is really bad, then mark 
>accordingly, but most images aren't like that, they are fairly good in their 
>own unique way, so the voting (and commenting) should reflect that for that 
>particular image.
>
Yeah, the 20/20/20 should be a last resort IMO. I did not know that new entrants
could not vote. Maybe if a score is less than 5 a comment must be made
compulsory (?)

>> BTW in the stills challenge Ian MacKay's image is not shown.
>
>     Ah, thanks for pointing that out Stephen, this is because I had to 
>change Ian's username to give him voting rights on animations. I'll email 
>him and ask him to re-upload the image.
>
Oh! Is he going to upload an animation? I hope so.

>   (See? I told you I was in a typing frenzy!)  :o)

Those little fingers must be worn t the bone :)
-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message